The World Cup final is the single most bet-on football match on the planet. For new fans and first-time bettors, the final brings a unique mix of pressure, history, and tactics that do not always behave like a normal match. This guide walks through what World Cup finals have actually looked like over the years, using verified historical data, so you understand what you are looking at once the two 2026 finalists are confirmed on July 19.
This guide does not predict who will win the 2026 final or offer specific odds, since the two finalists are not yet known. What it gives you instead is a clear, research-based framework for reading the final once the matchup is set, built entirely on real World Cup final history.
Who will win the 2026 World Cup?
A common mistake new bettors make is treating the final like any other knockout match. It is not. The final carries a level of caution that even semifinals do not fully match. Up to and including the 2022 final, only 22 World Cup finals have been played across the tournament’s history, producing a combined total of 83 goals from 62 different players. That works out to well under 4 goals per final on average across more than nine decades of football, and recent finals have generally sat below the all-time average rather than above it.
The lesson for bettors is simple. Whatever attacking reputation either finalist carries into the match, the final itself has a long history of being tighter and more cautious than the matches that got each team there.
How often does the favourite actually win a World Cup final
It is tempting to assume the team with the shorter odds before the final almost always lifts the trophy, but World Cup history shows the final is one of the more unpredictable fixtures in the tournament once two strong teams reach it. Shock results earlier in tournaments, like Saudi Arabia’s win over Argentina in the 2022 group stage, are a reminder that even heavily favoured teams can be beaten on a single bad day. The final adds extra layers of pressure, fatigue from a long tournament, and one-off matchups that do not always follow form.
Rather than assuming the bookmakers’ favourite is a safe bet, new bettors should look at how each team arrived at the final. A team that needed penalties or extra time to get through the semifinal often arrives with less in the tank than a team that won comfortably in normal time. This kind of context tends to matter more in the final than raw squad reputation.
Why do World Cup finals so often go to extra time
One of the clearest patterns in World Cup final history is how often the match cannot be settled in 90 minutes. Three finals in history have gone all the way to a penalty shootout: Brazil’s win over Italy in 1994, Italy’s win over France in 2006, and Argentina’s win over France in 2022. Both the 1994 and 2006 shootout finals were preceded by extra time, and the 1994 final remains the only World Cup final in history where neither team scored across the full 120 minutes of play.
This matters for betting because markets like “match to go to extra time” or “match to be decided on penalties” are not just trivia questions. They are realistic outcomes with real history behind them. Three shootouts in 22 finals means roughly one in seven finals has gone all the way to penalties, a far higher rate than a casual fan might assume looking at a single final in isolation.
What the highest-scoring finals in history teach new bettors
While many finals have been tight defensive battles, a handful have produced genuine goal fests, and these are worth understanding too. Four finals have finished with six total goals: Uruguay’s win over Argentina in 1930, Italy’s win over Hungary in 1938, France’s loss to Croatia in 2018, and France’s loss to Argentina in 2022. Notably, the two most recent finals before 2026 were both six-goal thrillers, breaking from the more typical pattern of cagey, low-scoring finals seen in many other decades.
Brazil’s 5-2 win over Sweden in 1958 remains the largest winning margin in any World Cup final, while Brazil’s 4-1 win over Italy in 1970 and France’s 3-0 win over Brazil in 1998 are the only other finals settled by a three-goal margin. These blowout results are rare exceptions rather than the rule, but they show that when a final does open up, it can open up dramatically, particularly when one team’s game plan completely breaks down under pressure, as happened to Brazil in 1998.
For a new bettor looking at the over/under market on the final, the realistic range based on history sits mostly between 1 and 4 goals, with the 6-goal finals in 2018 and 2022 standing out as recent exceptions rather than the new normal.
The pattern of star players showing up in the biggest moment
World Cup finals also have a notable history of being decided by individual brilliance from a small number of elite players, which matters for markets like anytime goalscorer in the final. Kylian Mbappe holds the record for most goals in World Cup finals with four, split between a goal against Croatia in 2018 and a hat trick against Argentina in 2022, making him the only player to score in two different finals more than once each. Pele, Vava, and Zinedine Zidane have each scored three goals across multiple finals, while only England’s Geoff Hurst in 1966 and Mbappe in 2022 have scored a hat trick in a final.
This pattern suggests that when a final does produce goals, they are disproportionately likely to come from a team’s most recognised attacking player rather than spread evenly across the squad. New bettors looking at goalscorer markets should weigh a team’s primary attacking threat heavily, since finals history shows star players tend to deliver in the biggest moment more often than role players do.
How penalty shootouts play out
If the 2026 final does reach penalties, history gives a useful guide to how shootouts tend to unfold. Nearly three in four teams have converted their first penalty in World Cup shootout history, but that success rate drops as the shootout goes deeper, falling to roughly fifty per cent by the sixth kick taken. This is useful context for in-play betting markets if a final does go to penalties, since the safest assumption is that the opening kicks are more likely to be converted than later ones.
It is also worth knowing that two teams in World Cup shootout history failed to convert a single penalty: Switzerland against Ukraine in 2006 and Spain against Morocco in 2022, both following scoreless draws after extra time. These results show that shootouts are not simply a coin flip weighted by reputation. Goalkeeping form on the day and the composure of specific takers can matter more than which team was favoured to win the match in regulation time.
Comparing the last two finals to think about what 2026 might bring
The 2018 and 2022 finals offer the most relevant recent comparison for 2026, since football has changed significantly since the days of low-scoring, cautious finals decided by a single goal. Both of the last two finals produced six total goals, a marked shift from much of World Cup final history. The 2022 final between France and Argentina set the tournament’s all-time goals record at 172 total goals across the competition, with the six-goal final itself contributing to that mark, while the 2018 final between France and Croatia had already matched a similarly high-scoring pattern.
Whether this represents a genuine shift toward higher-scoring finals or simply two unusually dramatic matches in a row is impossible to know for certain. What is clear is that recent finals have trended toward more open, attacking football compared to many of the tense, low-scoring finals of past decades, and new bettors should weigh this recent trend alongside the longer historical average rather than relying on either one alone.
5 Practical advice for betting on the 2026 final match
- Once the two finalists are confirmed, look at how each team got there rather than just their reputation entering the tournament. A team that survived a grueling penalty shootout in the semifinal carries a different risk than one that won comfortably.
- Check each team’s primary goal threat and recent goalscoring form heading into the final, since history shows finals are disproportionately decided by a small number of elite individual performers rather than spread evenly across a squad.
- Consider markets beyond just the straight winner, including extra time and penalty shootout markets, since roughly one in seven World Cup finals in history has gone all the way to penalties.
- Treat the over/under line with the knowledge that most finals in history have produced moderate, not extreme, goal totals, even though the two most recent finals broke that pattern with six goals each.
- Avoid assuming the bookmaker’s favourite is automatically the safer bet. The pressure, fatigue, and one-off nature of a single final match have produced plenty of upsets and unexpected results throughout World Cup history.
A final note before you bet
The World Cup final is the biggest stage in football, and that pressure changes how the match is likely to play out compared to anything else in the tournament. Use the real historical patterns covered in this guide, the tendency toward tight scorelines, the real possibility of extra time and penalties, and the outsized role of elite individual players as your foundation. Then layer in the specific context of the two 2026 finalists once they are known, including squad fitness, recent form, and how each team arrived at the final, before making any decision.
This guide is intended to help you understand World Cup final history and how to think about betting markets around it. It is not a guarantee of any outcome. Always bet responsibly and within your means.
Leave Your Comment Here